↓ Skip to main content

A defense of contingent logical truths

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A defense of contingent logical truths
Published in
Philosophical Studies, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9624-y
Authors

Michael Nelson, Edward N. Zalta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 11%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Poland 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 14 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Professor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 12 63%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,604,568
of 23,987,854 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#629
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,915
of 99,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,987,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.