↓ Skip to main content

A method to regenerate the damaged Chironomidae slides in entellan mounting solution

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paleolimnology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
A method to regenerate the damaged Chironomidae slides in entellan mounting solution
Published in
Journal of Paleolimnology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10933-014-9819-x
Authors

Armin Namayandeh, Joseph Culp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Environmental Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleolimnology
#329
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,791
of 361,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleolimnology
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.