↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and treatment of upper limb apraxia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and treatment of upper limb apraxia
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-011-6336-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Dovern, G. R. Fink, P. H. Weiss

Abstract

Upper limb apraxia, a disorder of higher motor cognition, is a common consequence of left-hemispheric stroke. Contrary to common assumption, apraxic deficits not only manifest themselves during clinical testing but also have delirious effects on the patients' everyday life and rehabilitation. Thus, a reliable diagnosis and efficient treatment of upper limb apraxia is important to improve the patients' prognosis after stroke. Nevertheless, to date, upper limb apraxia is still an underdiagnosed and ill-treated entity. Based on a systematic literature search, this review summarizes the current tools of diagnosis and treatment strategies for upper limb apraxia. It furthermore provides clinicians with graded recommendations. In particular, a short screening test for apraxia, and a more comprehensive diagnostic apraxia test for clinical use are recommended. Although currently only a few randomized controlled studies investigate the efficacy of different apraxia treatments, the gesture training suggested by Smania and colleagues can be recommended for the therapy of apraxia, the effects of which were shown to extend to activities of daily living and to persist for at least 2 months after completion of the training. This review aims at directing the reader's attention to the ecological relevance of apraxia. Moreover, it provides clinicians with appropriate tools for the reliable diagnosis and effective treatment of apraxia. Nevertheless, this review also highlights the need for further research into how to improve diagnosis of apraxia based on neuropsychological models and to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 221 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Neuroscience 33 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,079,875
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,752
of 4,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,876
of 253,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.