↓ Skip to main content

Estimates for the acoustical stimulation and heating of multiphase biotissue

Overview of attention for article published in Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Estimates for the acoustical stimulation and heating of multiphase biotissue
Published in
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10237-017-0988-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. I. Zohdi, R. Krone

Abstract

Low-intensity, unfocused, ultrasound-induced diathermy can produce undesired temperature increases at the interface of adjacent tissues within the body; particularly, at the interface of soft tissue and bone. This study provides a computational framework for predicting an upper bound on the temperature profile within a multiphase system composed of gel pad (water), tissue and bone from an input of acoustic energy, at frequencies and power levels consistent with applications of therapeutic hyperthermia. The model consists of solving a (one-dimensional) spatially discretized bioheat transfer equation via finite-difference method and updating the solution in time with a forward-Euler scheme. Simulations are then compared to experimental data to determine the energy-to-heat conversion factors within each constituent material using thermocouple-embedded, tissue-mimicking phantom material, with and without bone. Viscous heating artifacts from the presence of the thermocouples in the experimental phantom tissue are accounted for via additional experimental methods similar to those described by Morris et al. (Phys Med Biol 53:4759, 2008). Finally, an example application of the model is presented via prediction of the maximum temperature at the tissue-bone interface, as well as the peak temperatures in the composite structure at the end of a prescribed 2-min sonication, of blood-perfused, human soft-tissue at 1, 2 and 3 MHz frequencies and a spatial peak temporally averaged intensity of [Formula: see text]. The results of this simulation are then related to comparable experimental studies in the literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 15%
Psychology 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,405,036
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#186
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,616
of 442,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.