You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishment and Evaluation of a Novel Rapid Analysis Method to Measure Trace Levels of Radioactive Caesium in Surface Water by Using Absorbent Disks for Radioactive Caesium with NaI Scintillation Counter (ADiCS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2965/jswe.37.211 |
| Authors |
Yutaka KAMEDA, Hiroaki YAMAGUCHI, Masafumi TAMADA, OHTA Seiichi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 54 | 37% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#383,632
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
#1
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,585
of 320,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them