You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
TEETERING ON THE EDGE OR TOO LATE? CONSERVATION AND RESEARCH ISSUES FOR AVIFAUNA OF SAGEBRUSH HABITATS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.1650/7329 |
Authors |
Steven T. Knick, David S. Dobkin, John T. Rotenberry, Michael A. Schroeder, W. Matthew Vander Haegen, Charles van Riper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 7% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 205 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 63 | 28% |
Student > Master | 45 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 50 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#417
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,098
of 136,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.