↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators of exercise experienced by cancer survivors: a mixed methods systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
85 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators of exercise experienced by cancer survivors: a mixed methods systematic review
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-3964-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Briana K. Clifford, David Mizrahi, Carolina X. Sandler, Benjamin K. Barry, David Simar, Claire E. Wakefield, David Goldstein

Abstract

Exercise has been shown to improve the health and well-being of people who have survived cancer. Yet, less than 40% of cancer survivors in Australia meet the recommended 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity per week. Our objective was to systematically review the literature regarding barriers, facilitators and preferences for exercise for survivors of cancer. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for qualitative and quantitative articles addressing barriers, facilitators and preferences for exercise in cancer survivors. Quality assessment was performed by two independent reviewers using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Thomas and Harden's method of thematic synthesis was used to amalgamate qualitative data while descriptive statistics were used to collate quantitative data. Nineteen studies were included (9 qualitative and 10 quantitative). Persisting treatment-related side effects was the most commonly reported barrier to initiating or maintaining exercise, followed by lack of time and fatigue. The most common facilitators of exercise were gaining a feeling of control over their health as well as managing emotions and mental well-being, while the preferred method of exercise was walking. We also identified a lack of useful information provided to survivors regarding exercise. Treatment-related side effects, lack of time and fatigue were key barriers to exercise for survivors of varied cancer types. Insufficient patient education may contribute to the belief that exercise is not helpful when experiencing side effects of treatment, including fatigue. Identifying barriers and facilitators leads to improved support and education from health professionals which is required to provide safe and effective exercise recommendations for survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Master 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Researcher 21 8%
Unspecified 14 5%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 106 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 12%
Sports and Recreations 32 12%
Unspecified 14 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 123 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#821,238
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#58
of 5,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,594
of 451,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.