↓ Skip to main content

Taken last, selected first: The sampling bias is also present in the haptic domain

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Taken last, selected first: The sampling bias is also present in the haptic domain
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, December 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13414-014-0803-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Mitsuda, Yuichi Yoshioka

Abstract

When people are presented with a pair of images and asked to identify which one is more attractive, their eye gaze shifts gradually toward the image that they eventually choose. This study examined whether this sampling bias also occurs in other sensory modalities by observing participants' behavior in a haptic preference task. The results indicated that the participants tended to sample the chosen item just prior to making their decision when they were instructed to identify their most preferred item (i.e., the "like" task), but not when they were instructed to identify their least preferred item (i.e., the "dislike" task). This indicates that the sampling bias is a general phenomenon regardless of sensory modality. In addition, the sampling bias in the like task was larger when the difference in preference ratings between the paired items was smaller. However, the sampling bias decreased when the two items were given equal preference ratings, despite there being a longer decision time on those trials. This suggests that the sampling bias is not simply related to task difficulty, but is also related to preference formation and/or selective encoding of task-relevant information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 36%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 36%
Psychology 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,746,742
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#794
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,997
of 368,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.