↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of definitions of affordability for flood risk adaption measures: a case study of current and future risk-based flood insurance premiums in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of definitions of affordability for flood risk adaption measures: a case study of current and future risk-based flood insurance premiums in Europe
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11027-017-9769-5
Authors

Paul Hudson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 25%
Engineering 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,928,504
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#87
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,017
of 449,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.