↓ Skip to main content

Immunopathogenesis of membranous nephropathy: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Immunopathogenesis of membranous nephropathy: an update
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00281-014-0423-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanna Debiec, Pierre Ronco

Abstract

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a non-inflammatory organ-specific autoimmune disease which affects the kidney glomerulus, resulting in the formation of immune deposits on the outer aspect of the glomerular basement membrane, complement-mediated proteinuria, and severe renal failure in 30% of patients. In the last 10 years, substantial advances have been made in the understanding of the molecular bases of MN, with the identification of several antigens and predisposing genes in children and adults. These ground-breaking findings already have a major impact on diagnosis and monitoring and to some extent on therapies. However, there is evidence that the disease is more complex and involves a variety of antigen-antibody systems and genes involved in immune response, progression, recovery, and protective mechanisms. We herein review these recent findings which open new perspectives of research. Understanding the complex pathogenesis of MN will offer many opportunities for future therapeutic interventions and will hopefully have a major impact on patient care. New insights into the molecular mechanisms of MN may also enlighten the pathogenesis of organ-specific autoimmune diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,311,799
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#379
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,704
of 228,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.