↓ Skip to main content

Lying in a native and foreign language

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Lying in a native and foreign language
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0781-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Albert Costa

Abstract

This study explores the interaction between deceptive language and second language processing. One hundred participants were asked to produce veridical and false statements in either their first or second language. Pupil size, speech latencies, and utterance durations were analyzed. Results showed additive effects of statement veracity and the language in which these statements were produced. That is, false statements elicited larger pupil dilations and longer naming latencies compared with veridical statements, and statements in the foreign language elicited larger pupil dilations and longer speech durations and compared with first language. Importantly, these two effects did not interact, suggesting that the processing cost associated with deception is similar in a native and foreign language. The theoretical implications of these observations are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 39%
Linguistics 21 17%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 22 18%