| Title |
Can measures of muscle–tendon interaction improve our understanding of the superiority of Kenyan endurance runners?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-3067-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kanae Sano, Caroline Nicol, Masanobu Akiyama, Yoko Kunimasa, Toshiaki Oda, Akira Ito, Elio Locatelli, Paavo V. Komi, Masaki Ishikawa |
| Abstract |
Leg muscle activation profiles and muscle-tendon interaction were studied with eleven internationally high-level Kenyan and eleven national level Japanese distance runners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 27% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 60 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,645,894
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,262
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,251
of 367,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#26
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.