| Title |
Four spectral classes of cone in the retinas of birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, July 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00604167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
De -Mao Chen, Timothy H. Goldsmith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#404
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,704
of 10,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.