↓ Skip to main content

STRT-seq-2i: dual-index 5ʹ single cell and nucleus RNA-seq on an addressable microwell array

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STRT-seq-2i: dual-index 5ʹ single cell and nucleus RNA-seq on an addressable microwell array
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-16546-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Hochgerner, Peter Lönnerberg, Rebecca Hodge, Jaromir Mikes, Abeer Heskol, Hermann Hubschle, Philip Lin, Simone Picelli, Gioele La Manno, Michael Ratz, Jude Dunne, Syed Husain, Ed Lein, Maithreyan Srinivasan, Amit Zeisel, Sten Linnarsson

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-seq has become routine for discovering cell types and revealing cellular diversity, but archived human brain samples still pose a challenge to current high-throughput platforms. We present STRT-seq-2i, an addressable 9600-microwell array platform, combining sampling by limiting dilution or FACS, with imaging and high throughput at competitive cost. We applied the platform to fresh single mouse cortical cells and to frozen post-mortem human cortical nuclei, matching the performance of a previous lower-throughput platform while retaining a high degree of flexibility, potentially also for other high-throughput applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 10 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 21%
Neuroscience 13 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,221,772
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#33,214
of 124,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,414
of 438,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,040
of 4,219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.