↓ Skip to main content

Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 16,589)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
454 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information
Published in
Vaccine, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 549 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 17%
Student > Master 87 16%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 7%
Other 98 18%
Unknown 110 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 16%
Social Sciences 88 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 125 22%
Unknown 149 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1090. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,169
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#21
of 16,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 369,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#1
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.