↓ Skip to main content

San Francisco Children Living In Redeveloped Public Housing Used Acute Services Less Than Children In Older Public Housing

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
San Francisco Children Living In Redeveloped Public Housing Used Acute Services Less Than Children In Older Public Housing
Published in
Health Affairs, December 2014
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen E Kersten, Kaja Z LeWinn, Laura Gottlieb, Douglas P Jutte, Nancy E Adler

Abstract

Understanding the links between housing and health is increasingly important. Poor housing quality is a predictor of poor health and developmental problems in low-income children. We examined associations between public housing type and recurrent pediatric emergency and urgent care hospital visits. Children ages 0-18 with public insurance who sought emergency care from any of three large medical systems in San Francisco were categorized by whether they lived in public housing redeveloped through the federal HOPE VI program, nonredeveloped public housing, or nonpublic housing in a census tract that also contained public housing. After we adjusted for potential confounding characteristics, we found that children living in nonredeveloped public housing were 39 percent more likely to have one or more repeat visits within one year for acute health care services unrelated to the initial visit, compared to children who lived in redeveloped HOPE VI housing. We observed no differences in repeat visits between children in redeveloped HOPE VI housing and those in nonpublic housing. These findings support the continued redevelopment of public housing as a means of both improving the health of vulnerable high-risk children from low-income neighborhoods and reducing health care costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Social Sciences 13 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,284,552
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#2,384
of 6,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,755
of 368,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#39
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.