| Title |
Toward an Improved Representation of Middle Atmospheric Dynamics Thanks to the ARISE Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surveys in Geophysics, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10712-017-9444-0 |
| Authors |
E. Blanc, L. Ceranna, A. Hauchecorne, A. Charlton-Perez, E. Marchetti, L. G. Evers, T. Kvaerna, J. Lastovicka, L. Eliasson, N. B. Crosby, P. Blanc-Benon, A. Le Pichon, N. Brachet, C. Pilger, P. Keckhut, J. D. Assink, P. S. M. Smets, C. F. Lee, J. Kero, T. Sindelarova, N. Kämpfer, R. Rüfenacht, T. Farges, C. Millet, S. P. Näsholm, S. J. Gibbons, P. J. Espy, R. E. Hibbins, P. Heinrich, M. Ripepe, S. Khaykin, N. Mze, J. Chum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 48% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,894,916
of 24,201,556 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#86
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,537
of 446,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,201,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.