You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006544 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen Anderson, Danielle Stowasser, Christopher Freeman, Ian Scott |
| Abstract |
To synthesise qualitative studies that explore prescribers' perceived barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) chronically prescribed in adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 25 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 407 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 14% |
| Researcher | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 20% |
| Unknown | 105 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 57 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 127 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#362,456
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#613
of 25,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,104
of 368,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#10
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.