Title |
Effects of two contrasting canopy manipulations on growth and water use of London plane (Platanus x acerifolia) trees
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant and Soil, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11104-014-2143-4 |
Authors |
Neil A. Hipps, Michael J. Davies, Joel M. Dunn, Howard Griffiths, Christopher J. Atkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 38% |
Researcher | 3 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 4 | 50% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#21,415,544
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#3,089
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,737
of 230,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#32
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.