↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of inherited thoracic aortic disease – from gene variant to surgical aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Molecular mechanisms of inherited thoracic aortic disease – from gene variant to surgical aneurysm
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12551-014-0147-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Robertson, Candice Dilworth, Yaxin Lu, Brett Hambly, Richmond Jeremy

Abstract

Aortic dissection is a catastrophic event that has a high mortality rate. Thoracic aortic aneurysms are the clinically silent precursor that confers an increased risk of acute aortic dissection. There are several gene mutations that have been identified in key structural and regulatory proteins within the aortic wall that predispose to thoracic aneurysm formation. The most common and well characterised of these is the FBN1 gene mutation that is known to cause Marfan syndrome. Others less well-known mutations include TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 receptor mutations that cause Loeys-Dietz syndrome, Col3A1 mutations causing Ehlers-Danlos Type 4 syndrome and Smad3 and-4, ACTA2 and MYHII mutations that cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Despite the variation in the proteins affected by these genetic mutations, there is a unifying pathological end point of medial degeneration within the wall of the aorta characterised by vascular smooth muscle cell loss, fragmentation and loss of elastic fibers, and accumulation of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans within vascular smooth muscle cell-depleted areas of the aortic media. Our understanding of these mutations and their post-translational effects has led to a greater understanding of the pathophysiology that underlies thoracic aortic aneurysm formation. Despite this, there are still many unanswered questions regarding the molecular mechanisms. Further elucidation of the signalling pathways will help us identify targets that may be suitable modifiers to enhance treatment of this often fatal condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,924,721
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#239
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,772
of 359,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.