↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive step size LMS improves ECG detection during MRI at 1.5 and 3 T

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Adaptive step size LMS improves ECG detection during MRI at 1.5 and 3 T
Published in
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10334-017-0638-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

André Guillou, Jean-Marc Sellal, Sarah Ménétré, Grégory Petitmangin, Jacques Felblinger, Laurent Bonnemains

Abstract

We describe a new real-time filter to reduce artefacts on electrocardiogram (ECG) due to magnetic field gradients during MRI. The proposed filter is a least mean square (LMS) filter able to continuously adapt its step size according to the gradient signal of the ongoing MRI acquisition. We implemented this filter and compared it, within two databases (at 1.5 and 3 T) with over 6000 QRS complexes, to five real-time filtering strategies (no filter, low pass filter, standard LMS, and two other filters optimized within the databases: optimized LMS, and optimized Kalman filter). The energy of the remaining noise was significantly reduced (26 vs. 68%, p < 0.001) with the new filter vs. standard LMS. The detection error of our ventricular complex (QRS) detector was: 11% with our method vs. 25% with raw ECG, 35% with low pass filter, 17% with standard LMS, 12% with optimized Kalman filter, and 11% with optimized LMS filter. The adaptive step size LMS improves ECG denoising during MRI. QRS detection has the same F1 score with this filter than with filters optimized within the database.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 30%
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Linguistics 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%