↓ Skip to main content

Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Effect of baseplate size on primary glenoid stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soo-Won Chae, Soung-Yon Kim, Haea Lee, Joung-Ro Yon, Juneyoung Lee, Seung-Ho Han

Abstract

Use of a baseplate with a smaller diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing, especially in patients with a small glenoid or glenoid wear. However, the effect of a smaller baseplate on stability of the glenoid component has not been evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether a smaller baseplate (25 mm) is beneficial to the initial stability of the glenoid component compared to that with a baseplate of a commonly used size (29 mm).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 41%
Engineering 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,872,361
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#588
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,748
of 361,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#11
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.