↓ Skip to main content

Pole walking down‐under: profile of pole walking leaders, walkers and programs in Australia and factors relating to participation

Overview of attention for article published in Health Promotion Journal of Australia, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pole walking down‐under: profile of pole walking leaders, walkers and programs in Australia and factors relating to participation
Published in
Health Promotion Journal of Australia, December 2014
DOI 10.1071/he14034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliette O. Fritschi, Jannique G. Z. van Uffelen, Wendy J. Brown

Abstract

Issue addressed Although pole walking (PW) has the potential to be a useful health-enhancing physical activity (PA), little is known about by whom or how it is being practised. The aims of this study were to describe (1) the characteristics of PW leaders, pole walkers and PW programs in Australia, and (2) participants' perceptions of PW and their reasons for participation. Methods In 2012, PW leaders (n=31) and walkers (n=107) completed self-administered surveys that included questions about participants' sociodemographic and health characteristics, PW programs and perceptions of PW. Data were analysed using SPSS. Results Leaders and walkers were generally born in Australia (leaders, 71%; walkers, 83%), older (leaders, 55 years [s.d. 11.5]; walkers, 65 years [s.d. 10.6]) and female (leaders, 77%; walkers, 79%). Most walkers (82%) walked regularly in groups, approximately once per week for about an hour, at light to moderate intensity. The program's aims most strongly endorsed by PW leaders were to increase participant enjoyment (90%), increase PA levels (81%), provide a positive social experience (77%) and increase PA confidence (71%). The most strongly endorsed motivations for PW among walkers were to remain physically active (63%), improve fitness (62%) and personal and social enjoyment (60%). Conclusions In Australia, PW is being practised by a health conscious, older population. It is perceived as an enjoyable and health-enhancing outdoor activity. So what? Health and exercise practitioners may find that PW is a beneficial form of PA for older Australians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Psychology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,955,316
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Health Promotion Journal of Australia
#888
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,008
of 370,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Promotion Journal of Australia
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.