↓ Skip to main content

Ethnic Microaggressions and the Depressive and Somatic Symptoms of Latino and Asian American Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
Ethnic Microaggressions and the Depressive and Somatic Symptoms of Latino and Asian American Adolescents
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10964-012-9756-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia W. Huynh

Abstract

Ethnic microaggressions are a form of everyday, interpersonal discrimination that are ambiguous and difficult to recognize as discrimination. This study examined the frequency and impact of microaggressions among Latino (n = 247) and Asian American (n = 113) adolescents (M (age) = 17.18, SD = .75; 57 % girls). Latino adolescents reported more frequent microaggressions that dismiss their realities of discrimination and microaggressions characterized by treatment as a second class citizen than Asian Americans, but similar levels of microaggressions that highlight differences or foreignness. There were no ethnic differences in the extent to which adolescents were bothered by microaggressions. Moreover, even supposedly innocuous forms of discrimination are associated with elevated levels of anxiety, anger, and stress, which may increase feelings of depression and sickness. Microaggressions should be recognized as subtle discrimination that send messages about group status and devaluation, and similar to overt discrimination, can evoke powerful emotional reactions and may affect mental health.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 16%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 44%
Social Sciences 55 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,232,534
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#289
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,998
of 164,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.