↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Urology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
59 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
495 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
European Urology, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard H. Bochner, Guido Dalbagni, Daniel D. Sjoberg, Jonathan Silberstein, Gal E. Keren Paz, S. Machele Donat, Jonathan A. Coleman, Sheila Mathew, Andrew Vickers, Geoffrey C. Schnorr, Michael A. Feuerstein, Bruce Rapkin, Raul O. Parra, Harry W. Herr, Vincent P. Laudone

Abstract

Open radical cystectomy (ORC) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) are associated with significant perioperative complication risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 326 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 15%
Other 42 13%
Student > Postgraduate 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Master 28 9%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 88 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 120 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#719,387
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#333
of 6,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,901
of 368,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#4
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.