↓ Skip to main content

20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-4012-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Robinson, Christy M. Dunst, Maria A. Cassera, Kevin M. Reavis, Ahmed Sharata, Lee L. Swanstrom

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal reflux disease was introduced in 1991. Early safety, efficacy, and 5-10-year durability have been amply documented, but long-term patient outcomes have been criticized. This study presents 20-year outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) in a consecutive patient cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 19%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Psychology 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#12,713,868
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,523
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,294
of 361,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#33
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.