↓ Skip to main content

The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
Title
The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, December 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13428-014-0543-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick L. Oswald, Samuel T. McAbee, Thomas S. Redick, David Z. Hambrick

Abstract

Working memory capacity is one of the most frequently measured individual difference constructs in cognitive psychology and related fields. However, implementation of complex span and other working memory measures is generally time-consuming for administrators and examinees alike. Because researchers often must manage the tension between limited testing time and measuring numerous constructs reliably, a short and effective measure of working memory capacity would often be a major practical benefit in future research efforts. The current study developed a shortened computerized domain-general measure of working memory capacity by representatively sampling items from three existing complex working memory span tasks: operation span, reading span, and symmetry span. Using a large archival data set (Study 1, N = 4,845), we developed and applied a principled strategy for developing the reduced measure, based on testing a series of confirmatory factor analysis models. Adequate fit indices from these models lent support to this strategy. The resulting shortened measure was then administered to a second independent sample (Study 2, N = 172), demonstrating that the new measure saves roughly 15 min (30 %) of testing time on average, and even up to 25 min depending on the test-taker. On the basis of these initial promising findings, several directions for future research are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 270 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 23%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 140 51%
Linguistics 19 7%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 53 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,148,094
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#884
of 2,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,008
of 367,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.