↓ Skip to main content

The Gap Between Adaptive Behavior and Intelligence in Autism Persists into Young Adulthood and is Linked to Psychiatric Co-morbidities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
The Gap Between Adaptive Behavior and Intelligence in Autism Persists into Young Adulthood and is Linked to Psychiatric Co-morbidities
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3213-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine K. Kraper, Lauren Kenworthy, Haroon Popal, Alex Martin, Gregory L. Wallace

Abstract

For individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), long-term outcomes have been troubling, and intact IQ has not been shown to be protective. Nevertheless, relatively little research into adaptive functioning among adults with ASD has been completed to date. Therefore, both adaptive functioning and comorbid psychopathology were assessed among 52 adults with ASD without intellectual disability (ID). Adaptive functioning was found to substantially lag behind IQ, and socialization was a particular weakness. Comorbid psychopathology was significantly correlated with the size of IQ-adaptive functioning discrepancy. These findings emphasize key intervention targets of both adaptive skill and psychopathology for transition-age youth and young adults with ASD, as well as the need for ongoing monitoring of anxiety and depression symptoms during this developmental window.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 221 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 34%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 66 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,041,980
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#383
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,061
of 315,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.