↓ Skip to main content

Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation: A review and updated recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation: A review and updated recommendations
Published in
Movement Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/mds.26094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren E. Schrock, Jonathan W. Mink, Douglas W. Woods, Mauro Porta, Dominico Servello, Veerle Visser‐Vandewalle, Peter A. Silburn, Thomas Foltynie, Harrison C. Walker, Joohi Shahed‐Jimenez, Rodolfo Savica, Bryan T. Klassen, Andre G. Machado, Kelly D. Foote, Jian‐Guo Zhang, Wei Hu, Linda Ackermans, Yasin Temel, Zoltan Mari, Barbara K. Changizi, Andres Lozano, M. Auyeung, Takanobu Kaido, Yves Agid, Marie L. Welter, Suketu M. Khandhar, Alon Y. Mogilner, Michael H. Pourfar, Benjamin L. Walter, Jorge L. Juncos, Robert E. Gross, Jens Kuhn, James F. Leckman, Joseph A Neimat, Michael S. Okun, Tourette Syndrome Association International Deep Brain Stimulation Database and Registry Study Group

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may improve disabling tics in severely affected medication and behaviorally resistant Tourette syndrome (TS). Here we review all reported cases of TS DBS and provide updated recommendations for selection, assessment, and management of potential TS DBS cases based on the literature and implantation experience. Candidates should have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM V) diagnosis of TS with severe motor and vocal tics, which despite exhaustive medical and behavioral treatment trials result in significant impairment. Deep brain stimulation should be offered to patients only by experienced DBS centers after evaluation by a multidisciplinary team. Rigorous preoperative and postoperative outcome measures of tics and associated comorbidities should be used. Tics and comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions should be optimally treated per current expert standards, and tics should be the major cause of disability. Psychogenic tics, embellishment, and malingering should be recognized and addressed. We have removed the previously suggested 25-year-old age limit, with the specification that a multidisciplinary team approach for screening is employed. A local ethics committee or institutional review board should be consulted for consideration of cases involving persons younger than 18 years of age, as well as in cases with urgent indications. Tourette syndrome patients represent a unique and complex population, and studies reveal a higher risk for post-DBS complications. Successes and failures have been reported for multiple brain targets; however, the optimal surgical approach remains unknown. Tourette syndrome DBS, though still evolving, is a promising approach for a subset of medication refractory and severely affected patients. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 217 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Other 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Master 19 8%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 27%
Neuroscience 35 15%
Psychology 26 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Engineering 11 5%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 66 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#832,989
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Movement Disorders
#135
of 4,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,811
of 370,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Disorders
#4
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.