↓ Skip to main content

Squashed, magnetized black holes in D = 5 minimal gauged supergravity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Squashed, magnetized black holes in D = 5 minimal gauged supergravity
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/jhep02(2018)061
Authors

Jose Luis Blázquez-Salcedo, Jutta Kunz, Francisco Navarro-Lérida, Eugen Radu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#7,131
of 24,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,729
of 451,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#203
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.