↓ Skip to main content

Sibling Relationships: Parent–Child Agreement and Contributions of Siblings With and Without ASD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Sibling Relationships: Parent–Child Agreement and Contributions of Siblings With and Without ASD
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3393-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan L. Braconnier, Marika C. Coffman, Nicole Kelso, Julie M. Wolf

Abstract

Research on the experiences of siblings of individuals with ASD and the quality of their sibling relationships has yielded mixed results. The present study examined the significance of parent- versus child-report of both positive and negative behaviors exhibited by siblings and their brothers and sisters with ASD within sibling dyads. Findings indicated that siblings were more positive in their assessment of the sibling relationship than were their parents. Siblings exhibited more positive behaviors within the sibling relationship than did their brothers and sisters with ASD, and were recipients of aggression. These findings are consistent with prior research suggesting that siblings tend to take on a caretaking role, and point to important targets for intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 45%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,287,165
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,726
of 5,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,648
of 447,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#41
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.