↓ Skip to main content

Attendance at Fragile X Specialty Clinics: Facilitators and Barriers

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attendance at Fragile X Specialty Clinics: Facilitators and Barriers
Published in
American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, November 2017
DOI 10.1352/1944-7558-122.6.457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon A Kidd, Melissa Raspa, Renée Clark, Holly Usrey-Roos, Anne C Wheeler, Jessica A Liu, Amanda Wylie, Stephanie L Sherman

Abstract

The objectives were to describe the demographic characteristics of children with Fragile X syndrome (FXS) and to determine predictors of attendance at Fragile X (FX) clinics. Findings from the Community Support Network (CSN) and Our Fragile X World (OFXW) samples showed that children who attended FX Clinics were mostly male, high-school aged or younger, and white, non-Hispanic. Using logistic regression models, awareness about FX Clinic services, guardian education, and income (CSN), and child age, family income, and total number of co-occurring conditions (OFXW) were predictors of clinic attendance. Demographic and child characteristics accounted for a large portion of the explained variance. Importantly, symptom severity and parent knowledge about services were independent predictors beyond the demographic characteristics of families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 20%
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#375
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,227
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.