↓ Skip to main content

Identifying areas of deforestation risk for REDD+ using a species modeling tool

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Identifying areas of deforestation risk for REDD+ using a species modeling tool
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13021-014-0010-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naikoa Aguilar-Amuchastegui, Juan Carlos Riveros, Jessica L Forrest

Abstract

To implement the REDD+ mechanism (Reducing Emissions for Deforestation and Forest Degradation, countries need to prioritize areas to combat future deforestation CO2 emissions, identify the drivers of deforestation around which to develop mitigation actions, and quantify and value carbon for financial mechanisms. Each comes with its own methodological challenges, and existing approaches and tools to do so can be costly to implement or require considerable technical knowledge and skill. Here, we present an approach utilizing a machine learning technique known as Maximum Entropy Modeling (Maxent) to identify areas at high deforestation risk in the study area in Madre de Dios, Peru under a business-as-usual scenario in which historic deforestation rates continue. We link deforestation risk area to carbon density values to estimate future carbon emissions. We quantified area deforested and carbon emissions between 2000 and 2009 as the basis of the scenario.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Computer Science 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,157,367
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#75
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,989
of 361,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them