↓ Skip to main content

Quinua and Relatives (Chenopodium sect.Chenopodium subsect.Celluloid)

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Quinua and Relatives (Chenopodium sect.Chenopodium subsect.Celluloid)
Published in
Economic Botany, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf02860478
Authors

Hugh D. Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,465
of 15,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.