↓ Skip to main content

DomesticatedChenopodium of the Ozark Bluff Dwellers

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, April 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
DomesticatedChenopodium of the Ozark Bluff Dwellers
Published in
Economic Botany, April 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf02858690
Authors

Hugh D. Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Researcher 4 40%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 40%
Social Sciences 3 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#277
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,760
of 7,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.