↓ Skip to main content

Electronic information systems in human service organizations: Using theory to inform future design

Overview of attention for article published in International Social Work, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic information systems in human service organizations: Using theory to inform future design
Published in
International Social Work, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/0020872814554856
Authors

Philip Gillingham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 33%
Arts and Humanities 4 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from International Social Work
#472
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,356
of 353,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Social Work
#85
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.