↓ Skip to main content

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus: long-term outcomes from a prospective, single-center study

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus: long-term outcomes from a prospective, single-center study
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-4013-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian-Wei Hu, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou, Li-Qing Yao, Mei-Dong Xu, Yi-Qun Zhang, Yun-Shi Zhong, Wei-Feng Chen, Li-Li Ma, Wen-Zheng Qin, Ming-Yan Cai

Abstract

The sigmoid-shaped esophagus is considered to be the advanced stage of achalasia, in which the esophageal lumen is significantly dilated, swerved, and rotated. In consideration of the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for early achalasia, it may also offer another option for the treatment of advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus. Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility and long-term efficacy of POEM for patients with sigmoid-type achalasia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
India 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,312,760
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,786
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,924
of 361,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#71
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.