↓ Skip to main content

A Recurrent De Novo Nonsense Variant in ZSWIM6 Results in Severe Intellectual Disability without Frontonasal or Limb Malformations

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Recurrent De Novo Nonsense Variant in ZSWIM6 Results in Severe Intellectual Disability without Frontonasal or Limb Malformations
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.10.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth E. Palmer, Raman Kumar, Christopher T. Gordon, Marie Shaw, Laurence Hubert, Renee Carroll, Marlène Rio, Lucinda Murray, Melanie Leffler, Tracy Dudding-Byth, Myriam Oufadem, Seema R. Lalani, Andrea M. Lewis, Fan Xia, Allison Tam, Richard Webster, Susan Brammah, Francesca Filippini, John Pollard, Judy Spies, Andre E. Minoche, Mark J. Cowley, Sarah Risen, Nina N. Powell-Hamilton, Jessica E. Tusi, LaDonna Immken, Honey Nagakura, Christine Bole-Feysot, Patrick Nitschké, Alexandrine Garrigue, Geneviève de Saint Basile, Emma Kivuva, DDD Study, Richard H. Scott, Augusto Rendon, Arnold Munnich, William Newman, Bronwyn Kerr, Claude Besmond, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Jeanne Amiel, Michael Field, Jozef Gecz

Abstract

A recurrent de novo missense variant within the C-terminal Sin3-like domain of ZSWIM6 was previously reported to cause acromelic frontonasal dysostosis (AFND), an autosomal-dominant severe frontonasal and limb malformation syndrome, associated with neurocognitive and motor delay, via a proposed gain-of-function effect. We present detailed phenotypic information on seven unrelated individuals with a recurrent de novo nonsense variant (c.2737C>T [p.Arg913Ter]) in the penultimate exon of ZSWIM6 who have severe-profound intellectual disability and additional central and peripheral nervous system symptoms but an absence of frontonasal or limb malformations. We show that the c.2737C>T variant does not trigger nonsense-mediated decay of the ZSWIM6 mRNA in affected individual-derived cells. This finding supports the existence of a truncated ZSWIM6 protein lacking the Sin3-like domain, which could have a dominant-negative effect. This study builds support for a key role for ZSWIM6 in neuronal development and function, in addition to its putative roles in limb and craniofacial development, and provides a striking example of different variants in the same gene leading to distinct phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Psychology 7 11%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#3,455
of 5,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,473
of 445,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#42
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.