You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ストレス負荷時の食事摂取量の変化と必要な栄養素-被災者への栄養・食生活支援のために-
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.11379/jjda.53.349 |
| Authors |
須藤 紀子, 澤口 眞規子, 吉池 信男 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,022,932
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association
#3
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,179
of 246,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Dietetic Association
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them