↓ Skip to main content

Air detoxification with nanosize TiO2 aerosol tested on mice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hazardous Materials, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Air detoxification with nanosize TiO2 aerosol tested on mice
Published in
Journal of Hazardous Materials, August 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.042
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.S. Besov, N.A. Krivova, A.V. Vorontsov, O.B. Zaeva, D.V. Kozlov, A.B. Vorozhtsov, V.N. Parmon, G.V. Sakovich, V.F. Komarov, P.G. Smirniotis, N. Eisenreich

Abstract

A method for fast air purification using high concentration aerosol of TiO(2) nanoparticles is evaluated in a model chemical catastrophe involving toxic vapors of diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP). Mice are used as human model in a closed 100 dm(3) chamber. Exposure of mice to 37 ppm of DFP vapor for 15 min resulted in acute poisoning. Spraying TiO(2) aerosol in 2 min after the start of exposure to DFP vapors resulted in quick removal of DFP vapors from the chamber's air. Animals did not show signs of poisoning after the decontamination experiment and exposure to TiO(2) aerosol alone. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant activity (AOA) of mice blood plasma were measured for animals exposed to sound of aerosol generator, DFP vapors, TiO(2) aerosol and DFP vapors+TiO(2) aerosol. Reduced ROS and increased AOA were found for mice exposure to sound, DFP and TiO(2) aerosol. Exposure to DFP and decontamination with TiO(2) nanoparticles resulted in decreased AOA in 48 h following the exposure. The results suggest that application of TiO(2) aerosol is a powerful method of air purification from toxic hydrolysable compounds with moderate health aftermaths and requires further study and optimization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Professor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,119,728
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#1,382
of 7,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,835
of 118,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.