↓ Skip to main content

High dietary caffeine consumption is associated with a modest increase in headache prevalence: results from the Head-HUNT Study

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
High dietary caffeine consumption is associated with a modest increase in headache prevalence: results from the Head-HUNT Study
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10194-009-0114-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Knut Hagen, Kari Thoresen, Lars Jacob Stovner, John-Anker Zwart

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between caffeine consumption and headache type and frequency in the general adult population. The results were based on cross-sectional data from 50,483 (55%) out of 92,566 invited inhabitants aged >or=20 years who participated in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Survey. In the multivariate analyses, adjusting for age, gender, smoking, and level of education as confounding factors, a weak but significant association (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23) was found between high caffeine consumption and prevalence of infrequent headache. In contrast, headache >14 days/month was less likely among individuals with high caffeine consumption compared to those with low caffeine consumption. The results may indicate that high caffeine consumption changes chronic headache into infrequent headache due to the analgesic properties of caffeine. Alternatively, chronic headache sufferers tend to avoid intake of caffeine to not aggravate their headaches, whereas individuals with infrequent headache are less aware that high caffeine use can be a cause.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Psychology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,138,361
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#110
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,886
of 95,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them