↓ Skip to main content

Conservation of the Enzyme–Coenzyme Interfaces in FAD and NADP Binding Adrenodoxin Reductase—A Ubiquitous Enzyme

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Conservation of the Enzyme–Coenzyme Interfaces in FAD and NADP Binding Adrenodoxin Reductase—A Ubiquitous Enzyme
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00239-017-9821-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Israel Hanukoglu

Abstract

FAD and NAD(P) together represent an ideal pair for coupled redox reactions in their capacity to accept two electrons and their redox potentials. Enzymes that bind both NAD(P) and FAD represent large superfamilies that fulfill essential roles in numerous metabolic pathways. Adrenodoxin reductase (AdxR) shares Rossmann fold features with some of these superfamilies but remains in a group of its own in the absence of sequence homology. This article documents the phylogenetic distribution of AdxR by examining whole genome databases for Metazoa, Plantae, Fungi, and Protista, and determines the conserved structural features of AdxR. Scanning these databases showed that most organisms have a single gene coding for an AdxR ortholog. The sequence identity between AdxR orthologs is correlated with the phylogenetic distance among metazoan species. The NADP binding site of all AdxR orthologs showed a modified Rossmann fold motif with a GxGxxA consensus instead of the classical GxGxxG at the edge of the first βα-fold. To examine the hypothesis that enzyme-coenzyme interfaces represent the conserved regions of AdxR, the residues interfacing FAD and NADP were identified and compared with multiple-sequence alignment results. Most conserved residues were indeed found at sites that surround the interfacing residues between the enzyme and the two coenzymes. In contrast to protein-protein interaction hot-spots that may appear in isolated patches, in AdxR the conserved regions show strict preservation of the overall structure. This structure maintains the precise positioning of the two coenzymes for optimal electron transfer between NADP and FAD without electron leakage to other acceptors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 26%
Chemistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,471,447
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#389
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,605
of 440,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.