↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Genomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 13: Evolution of genome content: population dynamics of transposable elements in flies and humans.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Evolution of genome content: population dynamics of transposable elements in flies and humans.
Chapter number 13
Book title
Evolutionary Genomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-581-7, 978-1-61779-582-4
Authors

González J, Petrov DA, Josefa González, Dmitri A. Petrov

Editors

Maria Anisimova

Abstract

Recent research is starting to shed light on the factors that influence the population and evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements (TEs) and TE life cycles. Genomes differ sharply in the number of TE copies, in the level of TE activity, in the diversity of TE families and types, and in the proportion of old and young TEs. In this chapter, we focus on two well-studied genomes with strikingly different architectures, humans and Drosophila, which represent two extremes in terms of TE diversity and population dynamics. We argue that some of the answers might lie in (1) the larger population size and consequently more effective selection against new TE insertions due to ectopic recombination in flies compared to humans; and (2) in the faster rate of DNA loss in flies compared to humans leading to much faster removal of fixed TE copies from the fly genome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Austria 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 31%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 20%
Mathematics 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,125,493
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,097
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,096
of 248,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#65
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.