↓ Skip to main content

Whole exome sequencing is an efficient, sensitive and specific method for determining the genetic cause of short‐rib thoracic dystrophies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Genetics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole exome sequencing is an efficient, sensitive and specific method for determining the genetic cause of short‐rib thoracic dystrophies
Published in
Clinical Genetics, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/cge.12550
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.M. McInerney‐Leo, J.E. Harris, P.J. Leo, M.S. Marshall, B. Gardiner, E. Kinning, H.Y. Leong, F. McKenzie, W.P. Ong, J. Vodopiutz, C. Wicking, M.A. Brown, A. Zankl, E.L. Duncan

Abstract

Short-rib thoracic dystrophies (SRTDs) are congenital disorders due to defects in primary cilium function. SRTDs are recessively inherited with mutations identified in thirteen genes to date (398 exons). Conventional mutation detection (usually by iterative Sanger sequencing) is thus inefficient and expensive, and often not undertaken clinically. Whole exome massive parallel sequencing (WES) has been used to identify new genes for SRTD (WDR34, WDR60 and IFT172); however, the clinical utility of WES has not been established. WES was performed in eleven individuals with SRTDs. Compound heterozygous or homozygous mutations were identified in six known SRTD genes in ten individuals (IFT172, DYNC2H1, TTC21B, WDR60, WDR34 and NEK1), giving overall sensitivity of 90.9%. WES data from 993 unaffected individuals sequenced using similar technology demonstrated two individuals with rare (minor allele frequency <0.005) compound heterozygous variants of unknown significance in SRTD genes (specificity >99%). Costs for consumables, laboratory processing and bioinformatic analysis were <AU$850 per person. WES is sensitive, specific, efficient and cost-effective for mutation screening as well as gene discovery in SRTDs and should be considered a first-line methodology for mutation identification in affected individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Psychology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,932,146
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Genetics
#639
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,644
of 259,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Genetics
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.