You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Design and Usage of the HeartCycle Education and Coaching Program for Patients With Heart Failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
JMIR Research Protocols, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.2196/resprot.3411 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wim Stut, Carolyn Deighan, Wendy Armitage, Michelle Clark, John G Cleland, Tiny Jaarsma |
Abstract |
Heart failure (HF) is common, and it is associated with high rates of hospital readmission and mortality. It is generally assumed that appropriate self-care can improve outcomes in patients with HF, but patient adherence to many self-care behaviors is poor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
Psychology | 8 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,996,768
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from JMIR Research Protocols
#849
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,929
of 361,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JMIR Research Protocols
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.