↓ Skip to main content

Adipose Tissue Metabolism and Cancer Progression: Novel Insights from Gut Microbiota?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pathobiology Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 104)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Adipose Tissue Metabolism and Cancer Progression: Novel Insights from Gut Microbiota?
Published in
Current Pathobiology Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40139-017-0154-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedicte F. Jordan, Florian Gourgue, Patrice D. Cani

Abstract

Obesity is strongly associated with the development of several types of cancers. This review aims to discuss the recent key mechanisms and actors underlying the link between adipose tissue metabolism and cancer, and the unequivocal common mechanisms connecting gut microbes to adipose tissue and eventually cancer development. Complex interactions among systemic and tissue-specific pathways are suggested to link obesity and cancer, involving endocrine hormones, adipokines, fatty acids, inflammation, metabolic alterations, and hypoxia. Emerging evidence also suggests that the gut microbiota, another key environmental factor, may be considered as a converging element. Studies have shown that cancer susceptibility may be induced in germ-free mice colonized with the gut microbiota from high-fat diet-fed mice. Suggested mechanisms may involve inflammation, immunity changes, lipogenic substrates, and adipogenesis. Cancer development is a complex process that may be under the control of previously unthought factors such as the gut microbiota. Whether specific intervention targeting the gut microbiota may reduce adipose tissue-driven cancer is an interesting strategy that remains to be proven.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,776,336
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Current Pathobiology Reports
#14
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,715
of 327,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pathobiology Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them