↓ Skip to main content

Organic Amendments in a Long-term Field Trial—Consequences for the Bulk Soil Bacterial Community as Revealed by Network Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Organic Amendments in a Long-term Field Trial—Consequences for the Bulk Soil Bacterial Community as Revealed by Network Analysis
Published in
Microbial Ecology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-1110-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph A. O. Schmid, Peter Schröder, Martin Armbruster, Michael Schloter

Abstract

This study intended to elucidate the long-term effects of organic soil amendments on bacterial co-occurrence in bulk soil with and without addition of mineral fertiliser. Previous research mostly neglected the bacterial co-occurrence structure and focussed mainly on the parameters species diversity and abundance changes of species. Here we present a systematic comparison of two frequently used soil amendments, manure and straw, with regard to their impact on bacterial co-occurrence in a long-term field trial in Speyer, Germany. The approach involved 16S amplicon sequencing in combination with a bacterial network analysis, comparing the different fertiliser regimes. The results show an increase of bacterial diversity as well as an accumulation of bacteria of the order Bacillales in plots fertilised with manure compared to a control treatment. In the straw-amended plots neither an increase in diversity was found nor were indicative species detectable. Furthermore, network analysis revealed a clear impact of mineral fertiliser addition on bacterial co-occurrence structure. Most importantly, both organic amendments increased network complexity irrespective of mineral fertilisation regime. At the same time, the effects of manure and straw exhibited differences that might be explained by differences in their nutritional/chemical contents. It is concluded that bacterial interactions are a crucial parameter for the assessment of amendment effects regarding soil health and sustainability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 29%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 45%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,687
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,134
of 438,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#39
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.