↓ Skip to main content

Malt sprout, an underused beer by-product with promising potential for the growth and dehydration of lactobacilli strains

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Food Science and Technology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Malt sprout, an underused beer by-product with promising potential for the growth and dehydration of lactobacilli strains
Published in
Journal of Food Science and Technology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13197-017-2927-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luján Cejas, Nelson Romano, Ana Moretti, Pablo Mobili, Marina Golowczyc, Andrea Gómez-Zavaglia

Abstract

Malt sprout (MS), a by-product of the malt industry obtained by removing rootlets and sprouts from the seed of germinated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), was used as culture, dehydration and storage medium of three strains of lactobacilli: Lactobacillus salivarius CM-CIDCA 1231B and CM-CIDCA 1232Y and Lactobacillus plantarum CIDCA 83114. The three strains were grown in MS and MS supplemented with 20% w/v fructo-oligosaccharides (MS FOS). Bacterial growth was determined by registering the decrease of pH and by plate counting. Comparable results with those of microorganisms grown in MRS (controls) were observed in terms of lag times, ΔpH and acidification rates. Furthermore, during fermentation, a significant increase of DP6 (FOS with degree of polymerization 6) was observed at expenses of inulin and DP7, probably indicating their hydrolysis. A concomitant decrease of DP3, sucrose and monosaccharides was also observed, as result of their bacterial consumption during growth. The presence of FOS in the fermented media protected microorganisms during freeze-drying and storage, as no decrease of culturability was observed after 60 days at 4 °C (> 108 CFU/mL). Using MS appears as an innovative strategy for the production of lactobacilli at large scale, supporting their use for the elaboration of functional foods containing prebiotics and probiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Engineering 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 24 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,453,782
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#1,107
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,646
of 328,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#35
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.