↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic biology for microbial heavy metal biosensors

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Synthetic biology for microbial heavy metal biosensors
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0751-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyun Ju Kim, Haeyoung Jeong, Sang Jun Lee

Abstract

Using recombinant DNA technology, various whole-cell biosensors have been developed for detection of environmental pollutants, including heavy metal ions. Whole-cell biosensors have several advantages: easy and inexpensive cultivation, multiple assays, and no requirement of any special techniques for analysis. In the era of synthetic biology, cutting-edge DNA sequencing and gene synthesis technologies have accelerated the development of cell-based biosensors. Here, we summarize current technological advances in whole-cell heavy metal biosensors, including the synthetic biological components (bioparts), sensing and reporter modules, genetic circuits, and chassis cells. We discuss several opportunities for improvement of synthetic cell-based biosensors. First, new functional modules must be discovered in genome databases, and this knowledge must be used to upgrade specific bioparts through molecular engineering. Second, modules must be assembled into functional biosystems in chassis cells. Third, heterogeneity of individual cells in the microbial population must be eliminated. In the perspectives, the development of whole-cell biosensors is also discussed in the aspects of cultivation methods and synthetic cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 8 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Chemistry 6 4%
Chemical Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 50 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,641
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,062
of 446,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#19
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.