↓ Skip to main content

Half-Time Strategies to Enhance Second-Half Performance in Team-Sports Players: A Review and Recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
325 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
Title
Half-Time Strategies to Enhance Second-Half Performance in Team-Sports Players: A Review and Recommendations
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0297-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Russell, Daniel J. West, Liam D. Harper, Christian J. Cook, Liam P. Kilduff

Abstract

A number of intermittent team sports require that two consecutive periods of play (lasting for ~30-45 min) are separated by a 10-20 min half-time break. The half-time practices employed by team-sports players generally include returning to the changing rooms, temporarily relaxing from the cognitive and physical demands of the first half, rehydration and re-fuelling strategies, addressing injury or equipment concerns, and receiving tactical instruction and coach feedback. However, the typically passive nature of these actions has been associated with physiological changes that impair performance during the second half. Both physical and cognitive performances have been found to decline in the initial stages of subsequent exercise that follows half-time. An increased risk of injury has also been observed during this period. Therefore, half-time provides sports scientists and strength and conditioning coaches with an opportunity to optimise second-half performance. An overview of strategies thought to benefit team-sports athletes is presented; specifically, the efficacy of heat maintenance strategies (including passive and active methods), post-activation potentiation, hormonal priming, and modified hydro-nutritional practices are discussed. A theoretical model of applying these strategies in a manner that compliments current practice is also offered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 325 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 361 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 21%
Student > Bachelor 56 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 78 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 190 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 89 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#158,153
of 25,097,836 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#139
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,634
of 369,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,097,836 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.